The centre of the Modern art world shifted from Europe to the USA after
the Second World War. [1]Many artists had fled the horrors of the
war, and went to live and work in one specific city: New York.[2] A large number of ‘galleries,
subsidized educational institutions’ were built in New York after the war,
which made New York an attractive hub for creative talent.[3] Artists weren’t the only creatives
living in New York at that time. New York, together with London and Hollywood,
was one of the centres of ‘news, publishing, advertising’, and served as
‘headquarter to the world’s wealthiest media conglomerates’.[4]
Even though there are several cities in which media capital has grown
exponentially over the past few years, New York remains the home of some of the
largest media conglomerates worldwide.[5] How did the city manage to attract a
creative workforce, and how was this creative migration managed? New York was a
wealthy city, and money attracts labour. According to Professor Michael Curtin
this money should be spend wisely if a city wants to preserve its status as a
creative city, and should be spend to support already existing creative
initiatives in the city.[6] In addition, Curtin writes that the
‘residual aura’ of the city might play a role as well. Storper and
Chrisopherson argue that it is necessary to have ‘frequent transactions’
between different creative workers in order to support the growth of the
creative sector in a city.[7] This seems very logical in this age
of short-term contracts in the creative industries: people remain ‘close to the
largest pool of employment opportunities’.[8]
The growth of a cultural cluster hereby strengthens itself through time.
Much research has been done about the impact that human capital has on the
development of cities. An example of this is the book Cities and the
Creative Class by Richard Florida in which he did research on the
factors that attract human capital to a city. Both lifestyle amenities and
tolerance appeared to be fundamental for a city’s attractiveness for people
with a high amount of human capital.[9]
One of the most well known TV-series that is set in New York is Sex
and the City. This series follows the glamorous lives of New York
based writer Carrie Bradshaw (played by Sarah Jessica Parker) and her friends
Miranda, Samantha and Charlotte. Carrie is a writer, and Charlotte is a curator
at a gallery in New York. The series thus portrays these people with high human
capital in the city of New York and the professions of these characters link
the show to the concept of the creative city. The lifestyle amenities are
highlighted thoroughly throughout the series. The characters frequented just
opened nightclubs, cafés and restaurants and went to several museums and
cinemas. The series have been very successful, and are still attracting
tourists to New York today.[10] The series highlighted several
lifestyle amenities, and there are special Sex and the City tours
throughout the city. During these tours you can drink a cosmopolitan (the
signature drink of the series), and you visit sites that were frequented by the
series’ characters. These sites have, according to Professor Stijn Reijnders,
now become lieux d’imagination: physical traces ‘which might serve
as an entryway to another, imagined world’.[11]
Even today young, highly educated creatives enter New York City with the
notion they will be diving right in to a Carrie Bradshaw lifestyle.[12] But New York is expensive and the
lifestyle of writer, or any other creative, does not look like that of Carrie.
Where she got money for all those cosmopolitans and that beautiful Upper East
Side apartment is beyond us. New York is difficult, “once the initial
excitement of living in the Big Apple dies down, it suddenly becomes clear how
hard it is to purely exist, let alone thrive.”[13] It is interesting that New York
still holds a high concentration of creative labour, while most of these
individuals are breaking the bank to afford to live within this realm.[14] Especially those that are expected
to participate in higher class circles. As long as the majority of creatives
are staying in the Big Apple, the city will stay a centre of creativity.[15]
The series was not only a way to market the city of New York. The media
industry in the United States is an example of a media industry that has been
reviewed as a so-called market model. The series were produced by cable channel
HBO, which ‘started using original programming as a way of differentiating its
channel identity from other cable services’ in the 1980s.[16] The channel became known for its
high quality series, and aired the Sex and the City series between 1998 and
2004. According to Johnson, these high quality series ‘provided a justification
for its high subscription fees’.[17] HBO wanted to appeal to a more
upmarket audience that was able to pay the high subscription fees. In this
model ‘networks are really responding to advertisers, not viewers’.[18] With its upmarket audience, the Sex
and the City series was incredibly appealing to many brands, and the
series has become known for its ‘loose attitude towards product placement’.[19] The first the Sex and the
City Movie was sponsored by at least eight ‘‘promotional partnerships’ with
at least eight companies whose products appear in the film’.[20] According to professor Elayne
Rapping, the series is ‘very much a female fantasy of what working women
wish they had, but we all know we don't have’.[21] In the movie ‘consumption is
stimulated and satisfaction becomes associated with the buying of commodities’.[22]
Although the series has been very successful, it has also been criticized. Media brand VICE criticized the series because of its ‘shocking lack of diversity and its awkward insistence on gender tropes, among other offenses’.[23] According to David Croteau & William Hoynes the media have the ‘potential to promote social integration’.[24] Since the series mostly has an all-white cast, the Sex and the City series has not been a good example of showing society’s diversity and enhancing tolerance. This shows the major flaw of the market model in the media industries: it often does not ‘sustain a diversity of voices in a global era’.[25] As Hesmondalgh stated: ‘The most difficult question of all is whether or not texts promote the interests of businesses and dominant social groups by encouraging political and economic stability and discouraging progressive social change’.[26] Thus confirming the status and wealth of already existing media conglomerates. Sex and the City clearly confirms New York’s status as a creative city, but denies New York’s racial diversity.
Bibliography
Croteau, D., and Hoynes, W., (2006), ‘Media, markets and the public
sphere’, in: The Business of Media: Corporate Media and the Public
Interest. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press, pp. 15-40.
Curtin, M., (2011)’Global Media Capital and Local Media Policy’, in: J.
Wasko, G. Murdock and H. Sousa (eds), The Handbook of Political Economy
of Communications. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 541-557.
Davies, R. &
Sigthorsson, G., (2013). Introducing the creative industries: from
theory to practice. SAGE Publications Limited., p. 183.
Florida, R. (2005). Cities
and the creative class. Routledge.
Johnson, C. (2012) Branding
Television. Abingdon: Routledge. An in-depth stud of branding
strategies in UK and US television.
Reijnders, S. (2010), ’Places of the imagination: an ethnography of the
TV detective tour’, in: Cultural Geographies 17 (1), pp.
37-52.
Storper, M., & Christopherson,
S. (1987). Flexible specialization and regional industrial agglomerations: the
case of the US motion picture industry. Annals of the association of
American geographers, 77(1), 104-117.
Other
Website of the Guardian < http://www.theguardian.com/fashion/fashion-blog/2014/jul/23/the-top-30-brands-mentioned-in-sex-and-the-city >.
Website of the New York Post < http://nypost.com/2012/03/11/a-warning-to-a-new-generation-of-women-dont-let-sex-and-the-city-ruin-your-life/ >.
Website of PBS. < http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/newyork-postwar/>.
Website of Reuters < http://uk.reuters.com/article/2008/05/15/uk-sexandthecity-idUKN1530121420080515 >.
[1] Website
of PBS. < http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/general-article/newyork-postwar/ >
(4 October 2015).
[3] Michael
Curtin (2011)’Global Media Capital and Local Media Policy’, in: J. Wasko, G.
Murdock and H. Sousa (eds), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications.
Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 546-547.
[8] M.
Storper and S. Christopherson, (1987) Flexible specialization and regional
industrial agglomerations: The case of the U.S. motion picture industry. Annals
of the Association of American Geographers, 77 (1), p. Sorper
and Christopherson 1987, p. 110.
[10] Stijn
Reijnders (2010), ’Places of the imagination: an ethnography of the TV
detective tour’, in: Cultural Geographies 17 (1), p. 48.
[11] Website
of the New York Post. < http://nypost.com/2012/03/11/a-warning-to-a-new-generation-of-women-dont-let-sex-and-the-city-ruin-your-life/ >
(4 October 2015).
[15] R. Davies,
& G. Sigthorsson, (2013). Introducing the creative industries: from
theory to practice. SAGE Publications Limited., p. 183.
[16] Johnson,
C. (2012) Branding Television. Abingdon: Routledge. An
in-depth stud of branding strategies in UK and US television, p. 30.
[17] D.
Croteau & W. Hoynes (2006), ‘Media, markets and the public sphere’, in: The
Business of Media: Corporate Media and the Public Interest. Thousand Oaks:
Pine Forge Press, p. 29.
[18] M.
Ferrier < http://www.theguardian.com/fashion/fashion-blog/2014/jul/23/the-top-30-brands-mentioned-in-sex-and-the-city >
(23 July 2014).
[19] Website
of reuters < http://uk.reuters.com/article/2008/05/15/uk-sexandthecity-idUKN1530121420080515 >
(4 October 2015).
[22] A.
Conti, ‘ I went on a ‘Sex and the City’ Tour of a Bizarro Version of New York
City’, < http://www.vice.com/read/who-still-goes-on-a-sex-and-the-city-tour-in-2015 >
(4 October 2015).
http://thoughtcatalog.com/stephanie-georgopulos/2011/06/carrie-bradshaws-budget-in-real-numbers/
BeantwoordenVerwijderenYou're saying that the series is not only a way of marketing the city of New York. Does this mean that Sex and the City was created in order to contribute to creating and conveying this image of New York as a creative city? Isn't it more that this the underlying view that the creators have of the city and they portray it in this way because it's just the way they see it? Maybe it's an idealized view and it did have that effect, but I feel like you're confusing the intention with the effect. Please correct me if I misunderstand.
BeantwoordenVerwijderenI find it remarkable that there is a connection between the television show and the creativity of a city, I haven't really thought about it in that way. Do you think that the allure of a city in a TV-show is mostly attracting viewers from other cities or from the city's natives because of the recognisability?
BeantwoordenVerwijderen